c6a.large

Amazon C6a instances are powered by 3rd generation AMD EPYC processors and are designed for compute-intensive workloads.

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

Overall Score: 61

Over the past few days, I’ve been analyzing the AWS EC2 nodes currently running across multiple Kubernetes clusters in different regions, with various instance types. Here are the memory capacity differences I’ve found:

I've been using c6i instances in production for a couple months now, in the us-east-1 region. I replaced c5 instances. I'm currently looking at PHP performance on the c6a and we might switch to those if they perform comparably to the c6i. The c5a instances are not great for applications that are sensitive to memory latency, but do work well with more throughput oriented things like Kafka. Edit: looks like c6i is going to be the better option over c6a.

The grades below are those of the most recent trial run for this plan.

I've been using c6i instances in production for a couple months now, in the us-east-1 region. I replaced c5 instances. I'm currently looking at PHP performance on the c6a and we might switch to those if they perform comparably to the c6i. The c5a instances are not great for applications that are sensitive to memory latency, but do work well with more throughput oriented things like Kafka. Edit: looks like c6i is going to be the better option over c6a.

This plan was tested 1 times at vpsbenchmarks.com.

I cannot find AWS documentation or any information about AWS EC 2 - Instance Estimated Power Consumption IDLE and 100% for the following instances: c6a.large

I've been using c6i instances in production for a couple months now, in the us-east-1 region. I replaced c5 instances. I'm currently looking at PHP performance on the c6a and we might switch to those if they perform comparably to the c6i. The c5a instances are not great for applications that are sensitive to memory latency, but do work well with more throughput oriented things like Kafka. Edit: looks like c6i is going to be the better option over c6a.

I cannot find AWS documentation or any information about AWS EC 2 - Instance Estimated Power Consumption IDLE and 100% for the following instances: c6a.large

I cannot find AWS documentation or any information about AWS EC 2 - Instance Estimated Power Consumption IDLE and 100% for the following instances: c6a.large

I've been using c6i instances in production for a couple months now, in the us-east-1 region. I replaced c5 instances. I'm currently looking at PHP performance on the c6a and we might switch to those if they perform comparably to the c6i. The c5a instances are not great for applications that are sensitive to memory latency, but do work well with more throughput oriented things like Kafka. Edit: looks like c6i is going to be the better option over c6a.

I cannot find AWS documentation or any information about AWS EC 2 - Instance Estimated Power Consumption IDLE and 100% for the following instances: c6a.large

I cannot find AWS documentation or any information about AWS EC 2 - Instance Estimated Power Consumption IDLE and 100% for the following instances: c6a.large

I've been using c6i instances in production for a couple months now, in the us-east-1 region. I replaced c5 instances. I'm currently looking at PHP performance on the c6a and we might switch to those if they perform comparably to the c6i. The c5a instances are not great for applications that are sensitive to memory latency, but do work well with more throughput oriented things like Kafka. Edit: looks like c6i is going to be the better option over c6a.

If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

Overall Score: 61

Over the past few days, I’ve been analyzing the AWS EC2 nodes currently running across multiple Kubernetes clusters in different regions, with various instance types. Here are the memory capacity differences I’ve found:

I've been using c6i instances in production for a couple months now, in the us-east-1 region. I replaced c5 instances. I'm currently looking at PHP performance on the c6a and we might switch to those if they perform comparably to the c6i. The c5a instances are not great for applications that are sensitive to memory latency, but do work well with more throughput oriented things like Kafka. Edit: looks like c6i is going to be the better option over c6a.

The grades below are those of the most recent trial run for this plan.

I've been using c6i instances in production for a couple months now, in the us-east-1 region. I replaced c5 instances. I'm currently looking at PHP performance on the c6a and we might switch to those if they perform comparably to the c6i. The c5a instances are not great for applications that are sensitive to memory latency, but do work well with more throughput oriented things like Kafka. Edit: looks like c6i is going to be the better option over c6a.

This plan was tested 1 times at vpsbenchmarks.com.

I cannot find AWS documentation or any information about AWS EC 2 - Instance Estimated Power Consumption IDLE and 100% for the following instances: c6a.large

I've been using c6i instances in production for a couple months now, in the us-east-1 region. I replaced c5 instances. I'm currently looking at PHP performance on the c6a and we might switch to those if they perform comparably to the c6i. The c5a instances are not great for applications that are sensitive to memory latency, but do work well with more throughput oriented things like Kafka. Edit: looks like c6i is going to be the better option over c6a.