Unlock the Full Value of FinOps
By enabling safe, continuous optimization under clear policies and guardrails
October 5, 2025
October 6, 2025
October 5, 2025
October 6, 2025
As Kubernetes adoption grows, manual intervention becomes unsustainable, especially with the complexity of managing multiple clouds and clusters. Traditional tools focus on either cost or performance, leading to inefficiencies. The only safe way to scale is autonomous platforms like Sedai, which can proactively optimize resources in real time, ensuring that both performance and cost are managed automatically without relying on engineers to react to issues. This approach reduces waste, prevents downtime, and significantly lowers operational costs.
Kubernetes isn’t just for stateless services anymore. Surveys show that 98% of companies now rely on it to run their databases, analytics engines, and AI/ML workloads.
While adoption surges, engineering teams still struggle to operate Kubernetes environments efficiently. McKinsey notes that 65% of companies have more than 20% of their workloads in the cloud, yet continue to waste millions on under‑utilized resources and misconfigurations.
That matches what we see in practice: adoption accelerates, but costs rise, incidents stack up, and engineers are left firefighting instead of innovating. Traditional autoscalers and dashboards focus on cost or performance but rarely both. Engineers often overallocate resources to guard against failures, producing waste. That trade-off has become the default operating model for many organizations.
This guide is written for engineering teams who want to break out of that cycle. We’ll cover the practices that have proven to work in production and why the next stage of Kubernetes management lies in autonomous systems that balance cost, performance, and availability in real time.
If you’ve ever been responsible for keeping a Kubernetes environment running smoothly, you already know it’s not about spinning up some pods and calling it a day.
Kubernetes management is the ongoing discipline of deploying, operating, and optimizing containerized workloads across clusters. That means handling cluster provisioning, configuration, workload scheduling, autoscaling, observability, security, and cost monitoring, while keeping both developers and finance teams from breathing down your neck.
When companies adopt Kubernetes, they often deploy across multiple clouds or hybrid infrastructures. Each provider brings its own APIs, billing models, and security frameworks, and it falls on SREs and platform teams to make sense of it.
In our work with engineering teams, we've seen firsthand how the complexity of Kubernetes can lead to difficulties in managing clusters. Kubernetes brings incredible power and flexibility, but without the right management practices, you’re also dealing with the complexity of multiple layers: nodes, pods, containers, volumes, services, networking, and more.
Kubernetes management tools aim to provide a single interface to handle these differences, reduce administrative overhead, and enable automation.
However, what we’ve seen from years of working with engineering teams is that traditional Kubernetes management tools tend to focus narrowly on cost signals, not performance and availability. That’s not a trade-off any engineering leader wants to make.
Cost optimization and reliability are not competing priorities. You don’t get lasting cost savings if your applications fall over, and you don’t get reliability if your teams are constantly firefighting resource shortages. The only way to reconcile these pressures is to automate the balance itself.
That’s why the most effective platforms today don’t stop at sending alerts or handing you a list of recommendations. They take safe, autonomous actions in real time: right-sizing workloads, shutting down idle resources, and adapting clusters to traffic shifts without waiting for an engineer to play catch-up.
Kubernetes management spans several key domains: cluster administration, workload management, networking and storage, security, observability, automation, and governance, which need to work together coherently.
Below are the most effective practices in each of these areas that we’ve found to be critical in ensuring Kubernetes operates smoothly, securely, and efficiently.
In our experience working with engineering teams, we've found that skipping the planning phase can lead to unnecessary complexity later on. A one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t exist when it comes to Kubernetes clusters. Each workload, team, and use case has unique needs that must be considered from the outset.
Whether you’re running lightweight test clusters (like k3s or MicroK8s) or full production-grade clusters, your cluster type will shape your management strategy. For development or edge environments, lightweight distributions work well, but for production workloads, you’ll need a multi-node setup with a robust control plane.
Running several clusters can improve resilience and compliance, but it adds complexity. Multi‑cluster setups enable fault isolation, resource segregation, and geographic distribution. Determine whether your workloads require isolation or separate regions. When multiple clusters are necessary, unify configurations through GitOps and centralized policy tools to reduce drift.
If there’s one thing most teams consistently get wrong, it’s capacity planning. Over-provisioning remains a leading cause of waste, with 40% of excess spend attributed to it and 35% to idle resources. At the same time, underestimating traffic peaks can ruin your weekend.
Engineers often lean toward oversizing infrastructure because the fallout from wasted spend is easier to explain than a production outage. But both extremes are expensive in their own way.
Load testing, forecasting, and continuous rightsizing are the guardrails, but traditional autoscaling rarely solves the core problem. Autoscalers optimize for resource metrics like CPU and memory, not business outcomes like availability or latency.
What actually works is autonomous systems that act safely in real time, reducing waste without putting reliability at risk.
Planning a cluster is only valuable if the environment can be run with discipline. Effective cluster administration is about intelligent node management, regular updates, and ensuring your clusters are always secure and organized.
Efficient workload management ensures that your applications run as expected, with the right resources allocated at the right time.
Networking and storage are two areas where many teams encounter friction. Kubernetes is highly flexible, but to achieve optimal performance, it's crucial to have the right configurations in place for networking and persistent storage.
Security misconfigurations are a leading cause of incidents. Implement strong controls:
We’ve worked with teams where the cluster seemed “healthy,” but without granular metrics, invisible inefficiencies silently inflated their cloud bills. Observability isn’t just about alerting, it’s about understanding what your workloads are really doing and how that translates into cost.
Automation reduces toil and improves consistency, but it’s only effective if it’s adaptive. Traditional systems are usually reactive, applying the same automated tasks regardless of workload shifts. Kubernetes management must go beyond the basic "run the same task at a certain time" model. If your system can’t automatically adjust to changing demands, you’re still relying on engineers to intervene.
Kubernetes offers unmatched flexibility and scale, yet complexity is inevitable. With adoption soaring and most organizations experiencing at least one security incident, leaders must adopt disciplined Kubernetes management practices.
The tool landscape remains fragmented: managed services ease operations, self‑hosted and multi‑cluster platforms improve visibility, and FinOps and security tools highlight issues. Yet many still require engineers to interpret signals and act.
That’s why engineering leaders are turning to autonomous systems like Sedai, which go beyond reporting by continuously optimizing resources in real time by closing the loop between insight and remediation.
By integrating Sedai's automation tools, organizations can maximize the potential of autoscaling in Kubernetes, resulting in improved performance, enhanced scalability, and better cost management across their cloud environments.
Join us and gain full visibility and control over your Kubernetes environment.
Autoscaling adjusts the number of pods or nodes based on metrics like CPU or custom application signals. It also includes Vertical Pod Autoscalers (VPA), which manage CPU and memory resource allocation for pods, in addition to the Horizontal Pod Autoscalers (HPA) that adjust the number of pods. Event-driven autoscalers further optimize resources based on specific triggers. Kubernetes management is broader; it includes planning, provisioning, security, monitoring, policy enforcement, and cost optimization. Autoscaling is one component of a complete management strategy.
Managing clusters across multiple providers introduces complexity, fragmented governance, and rising costs. Platforms centralize control, provide unified visibility, and automate repetitive tasks. Research shows that over 68% of organizations intend to increase cloud spending, and without continuous optimization, costs can spiral.
Automated scaling and remediation aim to improve reliability by reacting to signals faster than humans can. Mature platforms allow engineers to define guardrails, such as maximum instance counts or approved regions, to ensure that automation stays within safe boundaries. Testing automation in non‑production environments builds confidence before wider rollout.
Review tooling and practices at least once per year or whenever significant business changes occur (e.g., adopting AI workloads or facing new regulations). Track key metrics like cost per request, mean time to recovery, and security incident rates to determine when adjustments are needed.
October 6, 2025
October 5, 2025
As Kubernetes adoption grows, manual intervention becomes unsustainable, especially with the complexity of managing multiple clouds and clusters. Traditional tools focus on either cost or performance, leading to inefficiencies. The only safe way to scale is autonomous platforms like Sedai, which can proactively optimize resources in real time, ensuring that both performance and cost are managed automatically without relying on engineers to react to issues. This approach reduces waste, prevents downtime, and significantly lowers operational costs.
Kubernetes isn’t just for stateless services anymore. Surveys show that 98% of companies now rely on it to run their databases, analytics engines, and AI/ML workloads.
While adoption surges, engineering teams still struggle to operate Kubernetes environments efficiently. McKinsey notes that 65% of companies have more than 20% of their workloads in the cloud, yet continue to waste millions on under‑utilized resources and misconfigurations.
That matches what we see in practice: adoption accelerates, but costs rise, incidents stack up, and engineers are left firefighting instead of innovating. Traditional autoscalers and dashboards focus on cost or performance but rarely both. Engineers often overallocate resources to guard against failures, producing waste. That trade-off has become the default operating model for many organizations.
This guide is written for engineering teams who want to break out of that cycle. We’ll cover the practices that have proven to work in production and why the next stage of Kubernetes management lies in autonomous systems that balance cost, performance, and availability in real time.
If you’ve ever been responsible for keeping a Kubernetes environment running smoothly, you already know it’s not about spinning up some pods and calling it a day.
Kubernetes management is the ongoing discipline of deploying, operating, and optimizing containerized workloads across clusters. That means handling cluster provisioning, configuration, workload scheduling, autoscaling, observability, security, and cost monitoring, while keeping both developers and finance teams from breathing down your neck.
When companies adopt Kubernetes, they often deploy across multiple clouds or hybrid infrastructures. Each provider brings its own APIs, billing models, and security frameworks, and it falls on SREs and platform teams to make sense of it.
In our work with engineering teams, we've seen firsthand how the complexity of Kubernetes can lead to difficulties in managing clusters. Kubernetes brings incredible power and flexibility, but without the right management practices, you’re also dealing with the complexity of multiple layers: nodes, pods, containers, volumes, services, networking, and more.
Kubernetes management tools aim to provide a single interface to handle these differences, reduce administrative overhead, and enable automation.
However, what we’ve seen from years of working with engineering teams is that traditional Kubernetes management tools tend to focus narrowly on cost signals, not performance and availability. That’s not a trade-off any engineering leader wants to make.
Cost optimization and reliability are not competing priorities. You don’t get lasting cost savings if your applications fall over, and you don’t get reliability if your teams are constantly firefighting resource shortages. The only way to reconcile these pressures is to automate the balance itself.
That’s why the most effective platforms today don’t stop at sending alerts or handing you a list of recommendations. They take safe, autonomous actions in real time: right-sizing workloads, shutting down idle resources, and adapting clusters to traffic shifts without waiting for an engineer to play catch-up.
Kubernetes management spans several key domains: cluster administration, workload management, networking and storage, security, observability, automation, and governance, which need to work together coherently.
Below are the most effective practices in each of these areas that we’ve found to be critical in ensuring Kubernetes operates smoothly, securely, and efficiently.
In our experience working with engineering teams, we've found that skipping the planning phase can lead to unnecessary complexity later on. A one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t exist when it comes to Kubernetes clusters. Each workload, team, and use case has unique needs that must be considered from the outset.
Whether you’re running lightweight test clusters (like k3s or MicroK8s) or full production-grade clusters, your cluster type will shape your management strategy. For development or edge environments, lightweight distributions work well, but for production workloads, you’ll need a multi-node setup with a robust control plane.
Running several clusters can improve resilience and compliance, but it adds complexity. Multi‑cluster setups enable fault isolation, resource segregation, and geographic distribution. Determine whether your workloads require isolation or separate regions. When multiple clusters are necessary, unify configurations through GitOps and centralized policy tools to reduce drift.
If there’s one thing most teams consistently get wrong, it’s capacity planning. Over-provisioning remains a leading cause of waste, with 40% of excess spend attributed to it and 35% to idle resources. At the same time, underestimating traffic peaks can ruin your weekend.
Engineers often lean toward oversizing infrastructure because the fallout from wasted spend is easier to explain than a production outage. But both extremes are expensive in their own way.
Load testing, forecasting, and continuous rightsizing are the guardrails, but traditional autoscaling rarely solves the core problem. Autoscalers optimize for resource metrics like CPU and memory, not business outcomes like availability or latency.
What actually works is autonomous systems that act safely in real time, reducing waste without putting reliability at risk.
Planning a cluster is only valuable if the environment can be run with discipline. Effective cluster administration is about intelligent node management, regular updates, and ensuring your clusters are always secure and organized.
Efficient workload management ensures that your applications run as expected, with the right resources allocated at the right time.
Networking and storage are two areas where many teams encounter friction. Kubernetes is highly flexible, but to achieve optimal performance, it's crucial to have the right configurations in place for networking and persistent storage.
Security misconfigurations are a leading cause of incidents. Implement strong controls:
We’ve worked with teams where the cluster seemed “healthy,” but without granular metrics, invisible inefficiencies silently inflated their cloud bills. Observability isn’t just about alerting, it’s about understanding what your workloads are really doing and how that translates into cost.
Automation reduces toil and improves consistency, but it’s only effective if it’s adaptive. Traditional systems are usually reactive, applying the same automated tasks regardless of workload shifts. Kubernetes management must go beyond the basic "run the same task at a certain time" model. If your system can’t automatically adjust to changing demands, you’re still relying on engineers to intervene.
Kubernetes offers unmatched flexibility and scale, yet complexity is inevitable. With adoption soaring and most organizations experiencing at least one security incident, leaders must adopt disciplined Kubernetes management practices.
The tool landscape remains fragmented: managed services ease operations, self‑hosted and multi‑cluster platforms improve visibility, and FinOps and security tools highlight issues. Yet many still require engineers to interpret signals and act.
That’s why engineering leaders are turning to autonomous systems like Sedai, which go beyond reporting by continuously optimizing resources in real time by closing the loop between insight and remediation.
By integrating Sedai's automation tools, organizations can maximize the potential of autoscaling in Kubernetes, resulting in improved performance, enhanced scalability, and better cost management across their cloud environments.
Join us and gain full visibility and control over your Kubernetes environment.
Autoscaling adjusts the number of pods or nodes based on metrics like CPU or custom application signals. It also includes Vertical Pod Autoscalers (VPA), which manage CPU and memory resource allocation for pods, in addition to the Horizontal Pod Autoscalers (HPA) that adjust the number of pods. Event-driven autoscalers further optimize resources based on specific triggers. Kubernetes management is broader; it includes planning, provisioning, security, monitoring, policy enforcement, and cost optimization. Autoscaling is one component of a complete management strategy.
Managing clusters across multiple providers introduces complexity, fragmented governance, and rising costs. Platforms centralize control, provide unified visibility, and automate repetitive tasks. Research shows that over 68% of organizations intend to increase cloud spending, and without continuous optimization, costs can spiral.
Automated scaling and remediation aim to improve reliability by reacting to signals faster than humans can. Mature platforms allow engineers to define guardrails, such as maximum instance counts or approved regions, to ensure that automation stays within safe boundaries. Testing automation in non‑production environments builds confidence before wider rollout.
Review tooling and practices at least once per year or whenever significant business changes occur (e.g., adopting AI workloads or facing new regulations). Track key metrics like cost per request, mean time to recovery, and security incident rates to determine when adjustments are needed.