m7i.large

AWS is launching an Elastic Cloud Compute (EC2) powered by custom Intel Xeon Scalable processors, otherwise known as Sapphire Rapids.

Best for CPU-based machine learning applications (up to 400 Gbps), gaming servers, video streaming apps

Ideal for workloads that need continuous high CPU performances for larger applications

15% better price performance compared to M6i instances and DDR5 memory

Offers price-performance benefits for workloads that need the largest instance sizes or continuous high CPU use

So which CPU is used for M7i Instance? And How many accelerators does M7i have?

I understand your explanation, but the reason why AWS took the decision is not clear, as the equivalent ARM instance type, m7g, has m7gd instance types, so is not only a matter of "consistency across different instance types"

m7i instances in AWS don't have built-in storage like previous types. Instead, they use EBS volumes for storage. AWS likely chose this because EBS is more flexible, reliable, and consistent across different instance types. It also allows for better cost management.

As you are aware, as of May 2024, there are no m7i series instance types with NVMe-based volumes.

I'm migrating from previous instance type m6id to m7i and I cannot migrate using the same storage configuration as m7i instance type has no Instance Storage

AWS has launched two new Amazon EC2 instances to manage the varying virtual workloads across multiple environments. The two new instances of Amazon Elastic Computer Cloud or Amazon EC2 are: M7i-Flex and M7i

So which CPU is used for M7i Instance? And How many accelerators does M7i have?

This video guides when to select m7i or m7i-flex AWS EC2 instances and difference between them.

HWInfo tool showed the reality, turbo frequency up to 3.8 GHz.

The M7i[1] EC2 instance types supports CPU Clock Frequency of upto 3.2 GHz. The Windows Task Manager does not show the Turbo Frequency on the Nitro Based EC2 instances. You can get information about Turbo Frequency using third party tools such as HWInfo[1]. This issue doesn’t limit the instance from using the Turbo Frequency.

Provision to attach up to 128 EBS volumes of each M7i instances

Best for CPU-based machine learning applications (up to 400 Gbps), gaming servers, video streaming apps

Available in nine sizes

Ideal for workloads that need continuous high CPU performances for larger applications

Larger instance sizes (up to 48xlarge) / Bare metal sizes (metal-24xl, metal-48xl)

15% better price performance compared to M6i instances and DDR5 memory

Offers price-performance benefits for workloads that need the largest instance sizes or continuous high CPU use

AWS has launched two new Amazon EC2 instances to manage the varying virtual workloads across multiple environments.

The M7 instances have a slight speed advantage even though the overall specification is the same with 2vCPU and 8GB of memory.

As you are aware, as of May 2024, there are no m7i series instance types with NVMe-based volumes.

As you are aware, as of May 2024, there are no m7i series instance types with NVMe-based volumes.

m7i instances in AWS don't have built-in storage like previous types. Instead, they use EBS volumes for storage. AWS likely chose this because EBS is more flexible, reliable, and consistent across different instance types. It also allows for better cost management.

I understand your explanation, but the reason why AWS took the decision is not clear, as the equivalent ARM instance type, m7g, has m7gd instance types, so is not only a matter of "consistency across different instance types"

m7i instances in AWS don't have built-in storage like previous types. Instead, they use EBS volumes for storage. AWS likely chose this because EBS is more flexible, reliable, and consistent across different instance types. It also allows for better cost management.

I'm migrating from previous instance type m6id to m7i and I cannot migrate using the same storage configuration as m7i instance type has no Instance Storage

I understand your explanation, but the reason why AWS took the decision is not clear, as the equivalent ARM instance type, m7g, has m7gd instance types, so is not only a matter of "consistency across different instance types"

I'm migrating from previous instance type m6id to m7i and I cannot migrate using the same storage configuration as m7i instance type has no Instance Storage

as of May 2024, there are no m7i series instance types with NVMe-based volumes.

m7i instances in AWS don't have built-in storage like previous types. Instead, they use EBS volumes for storage.

the reason why AWS took the decision is not clear, as the equivalent ARM instance type, m7g, has m7gd instance types, so is not only a matter of "consistency across different instance types"

I'm migrating from previous instance type m6id to m7i and I cannot migrate using the same storage configuration as m7i instance type has no Instance Storage.

as of May 2024, there are no m7i series instance types with NVMe-based volumes.

the reason why AWS took the decision is not clear, as the equivalent ARM instance type, m7g, has m7gd instance types, so is not only a matter of "consistency across different instance types"

m7i instances in AWS don't have built-in storage like previous types. Instead, they use EBS volumes for storage.

I'm migrating from previous instance type m6id to m7i and I cannot migrate using the same storage configuration as m7i instance type has no Instance Storage.

As you are aware, as of May 2024, there are no m7i series instance types with NVMe-based volumes.

I understand your explanation, but the reason why AWS took the decision is not clear, as the equivalent ARM instance type, m7g, has m7gd instance types, so is not only a matter of "consistency across different instance types"

m7i instances in AWS don't have built-in storage like previous types. Instead, they use EBS volumes for storage. AWS likely chose this because EBS is more flexible, reliable, and consistent across different instance types. It also allows for better cost management.

as of May 2024, there are no m7i series instance types with NVMe-based volumes.

I'm migrating from previous instance type m6id to m7i and I cannot migrate using the same storage configuration as m7i instance type has no Instance Storage

the reason why AWS took the decision is not clear, as the equivalent ARM instance type, m7g, has m7gd instance types, so is not only a matter of "consistency across different instance types"

m7i instances in AWS don't have built-in storage like previous types. Instead, they use EBS volumes for storage.

I'm migrating from previous instance type m6id to m7i and I cannot migrate using the same storage configuration as m7i instance type has no Instance Storage

I measured cpu performance on the M7i, M6in etc… and all of them run at about max 8% cpu usage but the fps stay at around 30. It seems like it’s throttling … Any ideas? I need to run Indian servers. And i don’t know what to do.

i still have cpu credits available. More than enough. The performance is different in both regions.

We tried setting up On-Demand M7i, M6i and M6in (which is per AWS good for game server deployment) instances. But are getting the exact same result.

The M7 instances have a slight speed advantage even though the overall specification is the same with 2vCPU and 8GB of memory.