Cloud Mercato tested CPU performance using a range of encryption speed tests:
Cloud Mercato's tested the I/O performance of this instance using a 100GB General Purpose SSD. Below are the results:
I/O rate testing is conducted with local and block storages attached to the instance. Cloud Mercato uses the well-known open-source tool FIO. To express IOPS the following parametersare used: 4K block, random access, no filesystem (except for write access with root volume and avoidance of cache and buffer.
.png)


Is there any other documentation that compares performance between different generations (c5/c6/c7) and processor types (c6i vs c6g, for example)? The on-demand pricing per hour for a c6i.large (or a c5.large) instance is 25% more than for a c6g.large, which is not insignificant. And why does documentation for the AWS FGT 7.0 recommend c6i or c6g, whereas 7.2 and 7.4 recommend only c5?

The on-demand pricing per hour for a c6i.large (or a c5.large) instance is 25% more than for a c6g.large, which is not insignificant.

And why does documentation for the AWS FGT 7.0 recommend c6i or c6g, whereas 7.2 and 7.4 recommend only c5?

Is there any other documentation that compares performance between different generations (c5/c6/c7) and processor types (c6i vs c6g, for example)?

Is there any other documentation that compares performance between different generations (c5/c6/c7) and processor types (c6i vs c6g, for example)? The on-demand pricing per hour for a c6i.large (or a c5.large) instance is 25% more than for a c6g.large, which is not insignificant. And why does documentation for the AWS FGT 7.0 recommend c6i or c6g, whereas 7.2 and 7.4 recommend only c5?

I am just now trying to change the instance type and it's only letting me use the c6i platform - I was HOPING I could go to the c7g platform actually as the performance vs cost is stellar.

Is there any other documentation that compares performance between different generations (c5/c6/c7) and processor types (c6i vs c6g, for example)? The on-demand pricing per hour for a c6i.large (or a c5.large) instance is 25% more than for a c6g.large, which is not insignificant. And why does documentation for the AWS FGT 7.0 recommend c6i or c6g, whereas 7.2 and 7.4 recommend only c5?