c6g.medium

Amazon EC2 C6g instances are powered by Arm-based AWS Graviton2 processors. They deliver up to 40% better price performance over current generation C5 instances for compute-intensive applications.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

Overall we are happy with performance, compared to old stack we are at around 10% of the cost and I think our savings was more than 2x compared to x86 after locking in some rates. R6gd.metal (16x) vs R5d.metal (24x)

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

Amazon EC2 C6g instances are powered by Arm-based AWS Graviton2 processors. They deliver up to 40% better price performance over current generation C5 instances for compute-intensive applications.

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

Amazon EC2 C6g instances are powered by Arm-based AWS Graviton2 processors. They deliver up to 40% better price performance over current generation C5 instances for compute-intensive applications.

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?

The other difference is memory, your t2.micro instance has 1GB memory whereas the c6g.medium has 2GB of memory allocated, which also increases the price. Then there is the CPU architecture which is ARM, which won't be able to run x86 compiled applications natively and some applications will need to be recompiled specifically to run successfully.

So how would you compare the instance performance of `c6g.medium` cpu (AWS Graviton2 processors) with whatever t2 is using for its cpu? Is `c6g.medium` more efficient than 3 `t2.micro` instance if the t2 used all its cpu credit all the time?