c4.xlarge

While the chart above is a good start, there’s more than simply considering “Reserved vs. On Demand”. So let’s take a closer look at all the options…

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

Ah, I'm having the same problem! Which C series did you pick?

The c5 instance type has a high ratio of compute/CPU versus memory. If you have a compute-intensive application — maybe scientific modelling, intensive machine learning, or multiplayer gaming — these instances are a good choice.

Your application is CPU bound application and you should choose compute optimized instance, C4 is the latest generation instances in the compute optimized instances. I had similar application requirement and with **c4.xlarge** , i could get 40k/min on a single server within SLA of 10 ms for each request.

Your application is CPU bound application and you should choose compute optimized instance, C4 is the latest generation instances in the compute optimized instances. I had similar application requirement and with **c4.xlarge** , i could get 40k/min on a single server within SLA of 10 ms for each request.

I had similar application requirement and with **c4.xlarge** , i could get 40k/min on a single server within SLA of 10 ms for each request.

Your application is CPU bound application and you should choose compute optimized instance, C4 is the latest generation instances in the compute optimized instances. I had similar application requirement and with **c4.xlarge** , i could get 40k/min on a single server within SLA of 10 ms for each request.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.

The similar Compute Optimized c4.large has half the memory (3.75GB), and also costs $0.10 / hr. According to the docs, M4 runs at 2.4GHz and C4 at 2.9GHz, so the C4 is a 21% faster. They have similar Intel processors and features. If your job is CPU intensive then the C4 will probably be approximately 20% faster.